My latest science fiction novel
A Twisted Garden
is now available in paperback.
My Photo
Name: Simon Quellen Field
Location: Los Gatos, California, United States

See these newspaper articles

Science Toys Toys I bought for myself Ingredients Syndication feed



Monday, April 10, 2006

The world is no longer your oyster



Tiny plankton called coccolithophores remove carbon dioxide from the air. They make little shells of calcium carbonate from CO2 and when they die, they sink to the bottom of the ocean and make the sediments from which limestone is formed. They are also an important food source for many other creatures in the ocean, including most of what we catch and eat.

But the CO2 that they can't scavenge may cause them to go extinct in as little as 35 years.

What is happening is that CO2 levels are increasing. This is making the oceans more acidic. If the oceans are not slightly alkaline, then creatures that use calcium carbonate for their shells can't make the shells. The calcium carbonate simply dissolves in the less alkaline water.

Of course, if the coccolithophores go away, the CO2 will build up much faster. Other creatures that make their defenses out of calcium carbonate will also go extinct, such as corals, clams, oysters, abalone, mussels -- basically all of the creatures that make the seashells we collect on the beach. All gone. In our lifetime.

Animals that depend on those species will also go away. Starfish, cod, sea otters, walruses -- all feed on creatures that depend on calcium carbonate to survive.

In past periods of high CO2 levels, mass extinctions occurred, and levels of carbon dioxide only fell after mountain formation or new species evolved that sequestered carbon in the soil or in wood fibers. These are slow fixes. We won't live long enough to see them happen.

Present levels of CO2 are higher than at any time during the last 420,000 years, the length of time recorded in Antarctic ice cores. These cores show levels with a brief peak of 315 parts per million. Current levels are 381 ppm, and are expected to reach as high as 550 ppm by 2050.

Feedback mechanisms mean that extra carbon dioxide in the atmosphere causes heating, which causes more carbon dioxide and methane to be released from the ocean, which causes more heating.

It's not just the heat. High carbon dioxide levels cause mass extinctions. And current levels are higher than anything in the last half million years, and getting higher at a rate of 1.2 ppm per year.

We should expect that rate to accelerate due to feedback effects.

And, of course, we continue to burn fossil fuels and put more CO2 into the air.



3 Comments:

Anonymous Thanh Lim said...

I think there's some confusion, or misinterpretation in terms of the coccolithophores.

According to NASA, it somewhat confusing. From the article, it's great for the long term, to permanently remove carbon from the atmosphere. While it's being created though, it also generates CO2. So it could be a wash in the short term, but overall useful in the long term.

The article points out that the coccolithophores thrive in nutrient poor waters, and seemingly overtake a number of other plankton.

Do you have more information about their possible demise? The inference seems to be that they are blooming, and are not deminishing in numbers at all.

April 11, 2006 2:22 PM  
Blogger Simon Quellen Field said...

Quite so, on all points.

Until the carbon dioxide levels are high
enough to prevent calcite formation, they
should do quite well. It is after that when
they run into trouble. Whatever benefit the
coccoliths provide will be lost. If that is
floatation, they will sink. If it is
protection from predators, they will be
eaten, etc.

At the same time, coral reefs will be dissolving, as will the shells of all shellfish. And things that eat shellfish
might get a boost until all the shellfish are eaten, but then they will starve.

April 11, 2006 3:52 PM  
Blogger DigGil said...

a bit off-topic, but I was thinking if we are, for some reason, unable to avoid the mass extinction due CO2 then will evolve then some new especie resistant to CO2? Some kind of CO2 breather instead O2? Organisms can adapt very intelligently!

August 02, 2008 3:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

.